Re: Time for a new PC.
Posted: June 9th, 2013, 5:54 am
It's a combination between an SSD and a hard drive. The SSD being a cache basically.
Other than that sounds good.
Other than that sounds good.
Actually, Haswell has the capability now of changing clock speed without altering the clock speed of other parts of the system, so that won't be a problem.A§H»Elbarto wrote:If you are going to buy a new pc cooler somewhen you probably will have problems with the high profile ram. Those heatspreader or how you call it are just too high to fit below a good cpu cooler these day. I have a low profile ram like the kingston value ram and i never heard of overheating ram.^^
Same with the extra fans for the case. I only got three build in: cpu cooler, graphics cooler and psu fan and my pc is far away from overheating. I would try this set up without any extra fan for a while and look at the temperatures. If you think your pc really needs some cooling you can buy those fans later too.
I don't see how that at all changes real world benchmarks and what tech professionals say. Crysis 3 and Far Cry 3, both having newer engines, probably going to be used on the new consoles, have better benchmarks on the FX than the i5-3570k.«CE»Fuyuri wrote:Yes, the Xbox one and the PS4 will be using an AMD processor, but you also have to consider the entire machine and OS is designed from the bottom up to be a gaming system.
That last part is what I admitted to. I'm not going to deny what's obviously there, but multithreaded benchmarks always favor the FX-8350. It turns out those extremely bottlenecked cores bring some significant power to a relatively cheap processor. Almost on par with an i7-2600k in fact, which is still significantly more expensive.«CE»Fuyuri wrote:I'm not dodging it, but you are comparing 8 cores to 4. 8 very bottlenecked cores, at that. Per core performance in the lower end i5s is better than the high end AMD CPUs, go figure.
20% isn't barely when both processors are the same price, and Haswell is only 5-15% better on average. The FX's TDP is only 125w, the i5-4430's is 84 (only 4 watts less than Ivy Bridge mind you). As I said, you would have to game (run the CPU under load) for a thousand hours a year for three years for the power draw to cost $30 more than what the i5 series would offer. I don't even game for one hour a day, and Spec is looking into light gaming.«CE»Fuyuri wrote:Combined, the fx 8350 barely does better than the 4430, at a huge power draw.
The Xbox One is said to have something like three individual operating systems on an 8 core @1.6GHz CPU. I'm pretty sure the FX can handle just one and game.«CE»Fuyuri wrote:PCs have a lot more going on than that, and a lot more variables.